Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lycoperdon-perlatum.jpg

File:Lycoperdon-perlatum.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2011 at 20:31:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lycoperdon-perlatum.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lycoperdon-perlatum.jpg

•  Info created & uploaded by H. Krisp - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 20:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Citron (talk) 20:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't see what's so nice here (artistically speaking) - Benh (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

 Info You can see in the foreground a immature foot and to second 4 mature feet, which one has a hole in the top opens to release spores in a burst when the body is compressed by raindrops, a touch, falling nuts, etc. --Citron (talk) 23:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

• I'm sure it has encyclopedic value, but I don't find this picture very beautiful otherwise. As per Steven Walling. Maybe en wiki FPC is a better place also. - Benh (talk) 06:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Neutral I would suggest nominating for Valued Image. Capturing the puff is of extremely high educational value, but the quality isn't quite there for featured status. Steven Walling 01:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

What's wrong qualitatively speaking? Thank you to develop. --Citron (talk) 11:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

It seems a little dark, and the composition isn't super clear if the subject is the puff. Steven Walling 23:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Good depth of field, educational, the lighting seems very natural and it's framed pretty well. This image might not grab everybody because few people really care about mushrooms, but I find those other things I mentioned of this image better than the majority. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 04:43, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

• On commons, we care a lot more about artistic issues - Benh (talk) 06:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• I Disagree with opinion just above.--Jebulon (talk) 09:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

What's wrong artistically speaking? The colors are not shimmering enough? This is not the fault of this poor fungus. --Citron (talk) 11:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose I do agree with Benh's assessment. Image is good value but misses the pizazz to be considered the best of the best that commons has to offer. W.S. 10:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Please, see the other featured pictures of mushrooms and tell me what is so extraordinary compared to this one. --Citron (talk) 11:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Strong chromatic aberration at the far right mushroom, and lacking space on top becouse of the puff. I agree with Steven Walling on nominating this picture as Valued picture.--Snaevar (talk) 12:25, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The rework (masking) is not precise enough, very visible at high resolution (puff, and right mushroom) and it is a pity. Furthermore, please consider the over-categorization of the file.--Jebulon (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Citron (talk) 08:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)