Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lucerne - Rigi.jpg

File:Lucerne - Rigi.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2010 at 15:38:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lucerne - Rigi.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lucerne - Rigi.jpg

•  Info created by Didier Baertschiger - uploaded by MadGeographer - nominated by Matasg -- Matasg 15:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Matasg 15:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, very poor quality. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Avala (talk) 20:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Strong chromatic aberration in the top left corner, overall oily appearance, probably because of an aggressive denoising/smoothing. FPX might have been harsh, yet not totally unwarranted. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 02:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great view, and I think that it has potential. However, in addition to what Maurilbert said, I feel that there is too much darkness in the foreground, which creates almost too strong of a contrast, especially with a bright background such as this one; the dark trees, especially the one pretuding from the top left, almost "invade" the background view, which is one of the greatest aspects of this image IMO. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 03:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support nice JukoFF (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 23:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)