Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Limburg Cathedral, Nave 20140917 1.jpg

File:Limburg Cathedral, Nave 20140917 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2014 at 19:40:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Limburg Cathedral, Nave 20140917 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Limburg Cathedral, Nave 20140917 1.jpg

•  Info c/u/n by me, -- DXR (talk) 19:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The nave of Limburg Cathedral, usual technique. Unfortunately my position was not quite centered (small differences of a few cm become apparent if you take panos), but I still think that the result is quite pleasing. The cathedral was crowded most of the time and so I had to be very quick to get an image without major ghosts etc.-- DXR (talk) 19:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Haha, you're experiencing all the problems I have with my panoramas, I see. Yeah, it only takes a few cm of misalignment and things like arches lose their apparent symmetry. And of course creating the illusion of an empty cathedral by being selective about when you take each frame... I usually try to wait until everyone is out of the image, but it's not always possible. I've learned to be patient though. At least, I appear patient, but I'm throwing daggers at them in my head. ;-) Diliff (talk) 20:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
    • Yeah, it's driving me mad and often enough, the benches are not a very good indication either. Personally, I don't mind people sitting in the benches since most actually pray/meditate, which of course is the main purpose of a church. Those who wander about aimlessly are far more dangerous ;-). --DXR (talk) 20:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
      • True. I've just spent a week in Lithuania and one of the churches in Vilnius was full of brainless tourists. I don't expect people to always avoid walking in front of my camera (since it takes 5-10 minutes to shoot a full panorama), but these people were just standing right in front of the camera all the time. They could stand anywhere, but they didn't care that they were ruining my photos. It took 45 minutes of waiting to complete one panorama. Grrr! Anyway, I finally got it, and it was a really beautiful baroque church so maybe you'll see it here in a few weeks. :-) Diliff (talk) 21:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. Could very easily have been one of my photos. It has all the same signatures... Diliff (talk) 20:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support even the same lense like Diliff :) --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 08:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support because of the missing symmetry but also the subject itself, pretty, but not an outstanding motif Poco² 11:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice! Great quality!! --mathias K 06:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support--ArildV (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Cayambe, your support is much appreciated, but twice is a bit too much ;-) --DXR (talk) 19:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Ok,thanks for noticing :-) --Cayambe (talk) 12:13, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:31, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- KTC (talk) 19:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Basik07 (talk) 22:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 03:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors