Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LightSpiral.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:LightSpiral.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2009 at 22:17:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Light Spiral
  •  Info created by Andres G - uploaded by Andres G - nominated by Andres G -- Tucayo (talk) 22:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Tucayo (talk) 22:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose because of the crop. Since you are the creator of this file, you can easily remake it so it looks better. But good overall technical quality otherwise (no noise at all). Diti the penguin 22:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - No wow factor, along with a bad crop. Tiptoety talk 19:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - I uploaded a new version. Tucayo
  •  Comment Colourfull, original light artwork, but not a very even spiral even (having them on a string and letting it wind or unwind around a cylinder might work). Many (many, many, many) years ago I saw a photo made using coloured lights and long exposures to represent the orbits of electrons around an atom's nucleus. I think the nucleus was made up of red and blue lights, and the electrons were red long exposure circular trails. Of course the orbits were in three dimensions not just all on one plane - must have used multiple exposures so he didn't tangle the wires :-). It was an impressive and startling photo. Now, I'm not suggesting you do that (well you could, but people would probably complain it was an outdated model), but it might inspire you to think of something you can create that could be used in a wikimedia project. --Tony Wills (talk) 02:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose photo should be self-explanatory - this one isn't. It looks like one minute of playing with MS Paint. --Leafnode 09:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]