Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leadenhall Market In London - Feb 2006 rotated.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Leadenhall Market In London - Feb 2006 rotated.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2009 at 19:35:02
- Info created and uploaded by Diliff, nominated by Maedin Maedin\talk 19:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Info Leadenhall Market in London. Panorama of 3 segments taken with a Canon 5D and 24-105mm f/4L IS. Featured on en wiki.
- Support Maedin\talk 19:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support, Great image, I love it. Ktr101 (talk) 21:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Aqwis (talk) 05:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 07:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Tiago Fioreze (talk) 07:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy, no wow IMHO. —kallerna™ 13:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
OpposeI don't know. Reducing a 25 Mpx (allowing for a whopping 50% overlap) panorama to 4.7 Mpx? That's a informational loss of more than 80%. Hmmm. The result is palatable, but give me any time a giant Dschwen pano ;-). Lycaon (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)- Surely you should just judge the image for what it is and not what it could be? This was shot handheld and sharpness was an issue due to being marginally within a hand-holding shutter speed (1/15s), and also the small depth of field, so I downsampled it to a size that was sharp without sacrificing detail. If I took the photo with a 4 megapixel camera, would you still oppose it? Diliff (talk) 18:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral The picture is well enough not to oppose actually, but I stand by my previous comments. Lycaon (talk) 20:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Surely you should just judge the image for what it is and not what it could be? This was shot handheld and sharpness was an issue due to being marginally within a hand-holding shutter speed (1/15s), and also the small depth of field, so I downsampled it to a size that was sharp without sacrificing detail. If I took the photo with a 4 megapixel camera, would you still oppose it? Diliff (talk) 18:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Pudelek (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support I like colours and composition --Mbdortmund (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ianaré (talk) 17:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Some noise, but composition, colours, atmosphere and general quality are absolutely FP worthy. Very nice indeed! -- MJJR (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support I like it, its a bit different. Mtaylor848 (talk) 18:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 16:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)