Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landscape in Schellenberg (3).jpg

File:Landscape in Schellenberg (3).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2024 at 20:05:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Landscape in Schellenberg (3).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landscape in Schellenberg (3).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Thi (talk) 22:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Enthusiastic support I really love this composition. Please don’t crop this photo even if you get criticisms about including too much foreground. The square framing is really striking and unusual, and for me the foreground provides a nice contrast in terms of colour with the rest of the photo and leads the eye gently along the road up to the house. One of the nicest compositions I’ve seen in a while. Cmao20 (talk) 02:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Adorable! ★ 04:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unappealing weather, sorry. Boring trees in the foreground, characterless modern building. Overall it lacks wow in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 18:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Unattractive weather can also have its charm.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Famberhorst. The photo has a certain something that you can't ignore. --Cart (talk) 10:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I've to agree with Basile Poco a poco (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor technical quality with obvious halos around all the tree's branches that are against the sky. Surprised that supporters haven't noticed/don't mind. Charlesjsharp (talk)
•  Neutral the idea/composition is somewhat good, but the two shadowed trees are a bit too prohiminent IMO, and there is something somewhat unbalanced. A crop at bottom would not help as this will makes the trees even more prohiminent. I think a wider crop (in the extand there is no disturbing elements in the reality), i.e. more space on the both sides would have been better. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Basile. -- Jay.Jarosz (talk) 18:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
• Very interesting photo and educative discussion, thank you! My personal result from weighing up the arguments is  Weak support. --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Basile. Good QI, but not FP. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)