Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LG 시네마 3D TV 새 모델 ‘소녀시대’ 영입.jpg

File:LG 시네마 3D TV 새 모델 ‘소녀시대’ 영입.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2012 at 03:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:LG 시네마 3D TV 새 모델 ‘소녀시대’ 영입.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LG 시네마 3D TV 새 모델 ‘소녀시대’ 영입.jpg

•  Info created by LG전자 - uploaded by Puramyun31 - nominated by me -- Morning Sunshine (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Morning Sunshine (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good quality, but no "WOW" effect for me. Dipankan001 (talk) 03:52, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support perfectly sharp, nice postures, useful shot of a prominent band. Tomer T (talk) 10:31, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Well executed group shot. Full of character. Saffron Blaze (talk) 11:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support A featured picture from Asia, I like that.--Claus (talk) 12:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice composition, but insufficient use of the camera's native resolution due to either cropping or downsampling. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 12:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

 Comment IMO it doesn't make any difference, whether or not an image has been downsampled or deliveres the highest possible quality a Camera ist capable of. In the end every image stands for its one, regardless wich camera or postprocessing it has gone through. --Martin Kraft (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

IMO it does. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 20:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Maybe you should check the guidelines then ;) --Martin Kraft (talk) 18:03, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Maybe you should stop telling people what to do. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 12:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Support nice composition, but insufficient use of the camera's native resolution due to either cropping or downsampling isn't important. Our rule is minimum 2MP not maximum camera resolution. Regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Some strange "stripes" in the colors of the background. Otherwise good. I'll promote if corrected. Agree with Alchemist-hp moreover.--Jebulon (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Super cute girls, and don't care about size. When people give things away for free, we shouldn't ask for more... - Benh (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality image, sharp. Tomtomn00 (talk) 19:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Katarighe (Talk) 21:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support even though it may be a downsampled one as it comes from LG Electronics's flickr account. Jkadavoor (talk) 05:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unnatural color of the skin: white balance. The background at left zone is overexposed--Miguel Bugallo 13:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator at the English Wikipedia Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:17, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Uninspiring publicity shot. Gamaliel (talk) 22:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Jovian Eye _storm 12:36, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support— M♦Zaplotnik ^{my contributions} 06:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People