Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Lüdinghausen -- 2014 -- 5502.jpg

File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Lüdinghausen -- 2014 -- 5502.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2014 at 06:14:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Lüdinghausen -- 2014 -- 5502.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lüdinghausen, Burg Lüdinghausen -- 2014 -- 5502.jpg

2853

408

631

360

3500

2401

Movement in between exposures?

775

1377

328

248

3500

2401

Glare

•  Info created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 06:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 06:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Arturo de Frias Marques (talk)
•  Oppose Very nice composition and sky. The photo appears to be exposure fused from more than one image as there are ghosts on the right hand side from vegetation being placed differently in different captures. Also, the glare from the sidelamps on the path to the building are disturbing, sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 09:50, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks for your review. A small remark: It's a tone mapped image from a HDR image. IMO it's nearly impossible to take a HDR image of branches in the nature without movements. But the branches are not illuminated and IMO they are not disturbing.--XRay ^talk 10:24, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

• OK, HDR mapped and not exposure fused:) Anyway, the same effect regarding the ghosts. I agree you cannot avoid such effects unless you are in conditions of no or very low wind, and I also agree this aspect is not that important. I would also not have opposed due to that little detail in itself. For me the biggest issue is the glare from the lamps. --Slaunger (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Neutral Perspective looks strange Jiel (talk) 11:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment There is nothing special. There is a long bridge in front of the castle. It's the normal view.--XRay ^talk 05:25, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Nice idea and well done. The glares could be a bit less dominating but that doesn’t impair the image too much. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kikos (talk) 13:24, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Slaunger, sorry. + halos along the roof (oversharpening ?), and green CA near the right chimney. The sky looks unnatural to me. Excellent composition though, and very nice place.--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Green CAs are reduced/removed. Thanks for your advice.--XRay ^talk 15:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

• Weak  Support For the nice atmosphere and interesting subject and in spite of quality flaws and a centered corridor (would have preferred that the POV is not in the middle of the corridor bridge) Poco² 12:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 12:53, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Great job, good proportion, rich colors. Alphama (talk) 10:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Jee 13:24, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications