Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lörrach - Evangelische Stadtkirche.jpg

File:Lörrach - Evangelische Stadtkirche.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2014 at 21:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lörrach - Evangelische Stadtkirche.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lörrach - Evangelische Stadtkirche.jpg

1737

3595

120

434

5554

4494

Transition from shadow to sunlight

•  Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 21:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 21:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
• weak  Support – pity the tree covers so much of the building but I think this is hardly avoidable. Moving the camera a few metres to the right might have cropped the distracting blocks out and shown a little more of the tower. The bicycle wheels not being perfectly round is caused by the wide-angle view, I presume, because the dial-plates are. Impressive picture however. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 04:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only an average quality shot, nothing special. Unfortunate light: The front part of the church which is the main motive here is in shadow. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

The church isn't in shadow, open your eyes --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:41, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

open your eyes is unnecessarily offensive.--Jebulon (talk) 07:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Jebulon. IMHO the nominator is closed minded to any argument - he prefers not seeing the obvious. 2 hours later (as up to now only edit on an FPC page tody) - no comment. Und noch mal auf Deutsch: Der Nominator verschließt sich jeglichen offensichtlicher Argumente. Zwei Stunden später wird eine Nominierung von mir, die bereits mehrere Tage läuft, mit dem inhaltsleeren Kommentar n.th. featureable bedacht (als bis dahin einzige Editierung auf einer FPC-Seite am heutigen Tag) - da muss man glaube ich nichts mehr zu sagen. So macht FPC auf jeden Fall Spaß. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Die nachweisliche Falschbehauptung, die Kirche befände sich im Schatten, darf nicht unkommentiert bleiben. Und was meine Stimmabgabe beim Leuchturm damit zu tun hat und welche Relevanz sich hierfür ergibt, bleibt dein Geheimnis. Weiteres ist hier nicht zu besprechen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:18, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Is the church in shadow ? Isn't it ? Not my concern, but of course this can/must be discussed. But the way to discuss this is important, "open your eyes" is not acceptable here IMO. Retaliation votes ? No need to be a strict and circumspect observer to see that they exist in many cases here... Sometimes I feel that "persons" are more important than "pictures" in FPC.--Jebulon (talk) 09:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

I make Jebulon's words mine Poco² 11:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

*sigh* -- Colin (talk) 12:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

To maintain s.th. obviously wrong makes me uncomprehending. My advise to open the eyes is compared to this instability proper blandness. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:44, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Taxiarchos228: I have opened my eyes and as can be clearly seen by the annotation I have added to the nomination page, the facade of the main tower most prominently seen from the vantage point is clearly in shadow exactly as described by Tuxyso. I have to echo what other reviewers have said: Your comment about open your eyes is way out of line. It gives a poisonous work environment on FPC and is uncollegial. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose This is larger and sharper than your typical QI but isn't making me go wow either for the subject or the arrangement. -- Colin (talk) 12:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose. The composition isn't very compelling, with the tree obscuring the most interesting part of the scene. Diliff (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)