Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kostel sv. Jana Křtitele a Panny Marie Karmelitské na Makové hoře (2).JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kostel sv. Jana Křtitele a Panny Marie Karmelitské na Makové hoře (2).JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2012 at 17:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Chmee2 (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 19:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Good. -- Raghith 06:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- JLPC (talk) 09:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice light on the building, which IMHO should be sharper. There are small CAs too. Noisy sky. --Kadellar (talk) 10:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support very nice --Ladislav Faigl (talk) 14:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Gampe (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Support Dominikmatus (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment
I think the white balance is wrong.Better now --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC) - Oppose To me good composition with clear featured content, but color/ light management is clearly not featurable (and I know that from some of my proper nominations). CAs, white balance unbalanced, and the darky upper right area. Can you rework the color since the content is really featurable ? --Telemaque MySon (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- I will try play little bit with WB and see, what happen --Chmee2 (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Lighting not optimal, too much contrast. Sorry. - A.Savin 11:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Lighting and contrast is great --Tlusťa (talk) 12:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp, noisy sky, dust spot(s), white balance, perspective distortion, underexposed roof. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Could this be a case of canvassing? I'm sorry, Chmee2, but four support votes come from Czech users (like the creator and nominator) who don't usually participate in FP candidates. At least a strange coincidence, isn't it? --Kadellar (talk) 14:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Kadellar, I guess that the reason is a post on my Facebook profile, where I wrote that I am in nomination process with this image. However, without asking for voting. I wanted inform my friends outside a wiki-projects about something, what make me happy. I was also surprised, that many people add their votes later (and that they supported the image). But I was not asking people or recommended them support me (see for example my second nomination here, there is only one vote...). Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the explanation ;) --Kadellar (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Crooked light & colors. • Richard • [®] • 10:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- I like it. It has drama and its bold. Saffron Blaze (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I like a lot the building, but I don't like the cloud on the right (too dark). --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 11:29, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Noisy sky, but otherwise good picture. –ElmA (Talk – My files – E-mail) 09:21, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results: