Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Korostavnik.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Korostavnik.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2011 at 20:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Sidik iz PTU - uploaded by Sidik iz PTU - nominated by Sidik iz PTU -- Sidik iz PTU (talk) 20:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Support Sidik iz PTU (talk) 20:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)- Support Good level of detail. I can even see a small bug on the flower to the right.--Snaevar (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support well done photo --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Indeed good detail, but the composition is not featured and the bright flowers in the background are distracting. You could try to improve this by cropping, but if you want to take it all out, then maybe the crop would become too tight. --Nikopol (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)- Oppose We have thousands of similar shots, and this one doesn't stand out among others. Unaesthetic background. - Benh (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support: Beautiful. TFCforever (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Nice, poster like. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per Benh. Yann (talk) 20:20, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose As Benh. W.S. 08:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Cropped, as Nikopol described erlier.--Snaevar (talk) 01:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose We have thousands of similar shots, and this one doesn't stand out among others. Unaesthetic background. - Benh (talk) 22:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose boring composition.--Claus (talk) 23:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per Benh. Yann (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose As Benh. W.S. 08:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
