Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kit Kat.jpg

File:Kit Kat.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2024 at 12:22:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kit Kat.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kit Kat.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
•  Info Kit Kats at a supermarket in Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support I was wowed when I looked at this because I've never seen so many Kit Kats in my life (Note: not taken at a Japanese market). -- ★ 12:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Do we have any possible problems with copyright in uploading pictures where the KitKat logo features so prominently? Or does the logo fail to meet the threshold of originality? Cmao20 (talk) 14:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

  I don't know considering that there's the Kit Kat category. ★ 14:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

  The logo is too simple to have a copyright. Multiple public domain logos don't create a copyright. IMO the issue is the opposite: is there any ethic issue advertising this product? Yann (talk) 17:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

• IMO, no, it's a nice composition. But besides, didn't that issue disappear from the art world when Warhol's Campbell's soup cans were accepted as art, not just commercial art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Nice photo. I don't know whether it's below COM:TOO for all the relevant countries. Anyone who thinks it probably is not should feel free to start a deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Thi (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support I like the photo, anyway. It could be sharper but I don't think more sharpness would add that much in this case. Cmao20 (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support, though a descriptive filename would be nice (should be done once this nom has concluded). --SHB2000 (talk) 20:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

  Just "Kit Kat" is enough for easy-search purposes, IMO as the author. ★ 21:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Nope, since chocolate isn't the only thing called Kit Kat, you need to specify the name of your photo a bit better. I always associate Kit Kat with the nightclub in Cabaret, since we rarely see these chocolate bars here in Sweden. We have Kexchoklad instead. ;-) --Cart (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

But both associations are sweet ;) Wilfredor (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Neither the subject nor the composition are intresting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

  No problem, the arousal of interest is subjective ;) ★ 21:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose No symbolic meaning or relevance as a photograph, just a good picture. Felino Volador (talk) 16:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support If one wants a symbolic meaning, well, IMHO it has got one, and even a very ethical one: people buy and eat far too much of this and similar sweets. ;–) – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unappealing light, and per COM:FPC "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." Sharpness is not excellent at the corners, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's just Kit Kat. Good photo but not worthy of being featured IMO. Wolverine XI 13:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination ★ 17:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

  Arion, you are well aware that there is still a chance for this photo to pass, right (vote count sits at 7:5)? --SHB2000 (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

  No chance (unless all three visitors – Yann, W.carter and Wilfredor – vote in favor). ★ 00:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Info No chance to get any more reviews, {{S}} or {{O}}, as long as the {{withdrawal}} template is displayed on this page -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)