Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kirchschönbach Kirche Taufstein-20210321-RM-170747.jpg

File:Kirchschönbach Kirche Taufstein-20210321-RM-170747.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2021 at 08:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kirchschönbach Kirche Taufstein-20210321-RM-170747.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kirchschönbach Kirche Taufstein-20210321-RM-170747.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
•  Info created & uploaded by User:Ermell - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Great resolution and a symmetrical background. I find this a very restful composition and pretty darn close to perfect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the PoV is too low. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:32, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The number of pixels in the image isn't a guarantee of resolution. The long exposure (0.4s) will have required tripod but something went wrong. Shutter shake? Was a remote-control used or did the camera move after pressing the shutter button? Compare File:Kirchschönbach Kirche Taufstein-20210321-RM-170941.jpg, which is very much sharper. This is 72 blurred megapixels vs 62 sharp ones, though the other image has weaker composition. I also wonder about the subject. It says 1604 but it looks about as old as something I'd find for sale in my local garden centre. Is this a reproduction, and the original is elsewhere, or lost? -- Colin (talk) 09:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

• Much less interesting composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Question Yes, not old. Is AB the same as AD? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

• Probably indicating the Lectionary. 1604 was a "B" year. --Cart (talk) 11:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

• clap, clap, clap! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

• I could be wrong, of course, but it's my guess. --Cart (talk) 15:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  sounds unlikely - why would it be AB? 'AB 1604' could be German for 'from 1604', but you can see plaster peeling off the base. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

• Another good guess. Where are the church historians when you need them? :-) --Cart (talk) 17:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose sorry, looks like shutter shock or camera shake spoiled it, and there was room for higher ISO. --Ivar (talk) 17:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination. No point in spending more time on this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)