Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kaunas Priest Seminary, Kaunas, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Kaunas Priest Seminary, Kaunas, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2015 at 17:50:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Pofka -- Pofka (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Pofka (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2015 (UTC)- Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 18:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Thanks for the nom. Diliff (talk) 12:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking some amazing pictures in Lithuania! -- Pofka
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 19:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Oppose too little contrast (sunlit and shadow areas too similar in intensity) looking unreal -- KlausFoehl (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- I might be wrong, but it looks to me as if some HDR technique has been used. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- You're not wrong, it has. I'm happy to increase the contrast if you think the shadows look too bright. Diliff (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes I think so. Why not try an alternative version (although it is already some days into the voting) -- KlausFoehl (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- The contrast is fine. Shadows looks like shadows (especially the one at the center). Lowering contrast will probably reduce the building visibility and there will be no "WOW" effect. -- Pofka
- Yes I think so. Why not try an alternative version (although it is already some days into the voting) -- KlausFoehl (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- You're not wrong, it has. I'm happy to increase the contrast if you think the shadows look too bright. Diliff (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- I might be wrong, but it looks to me as if some HDR technique has been used. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment Diliff assembly error, see note -- ChristianFerrer 06:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- KlausFoehl and Christian, I've uploaded a new version which corrects the two problems reported, the stitching error and the contrast. Diliff (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Support nicely contrasted -- ChristianFerrer 12:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Looks more natural now. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 05:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
