Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katarina kyrka och kyrkogård January 2013.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Katarina kyrka och kyrkogård January 2013.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2013 at 14:27:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Katarina kyrka (church) and cemetery in Södermalm, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 14:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 14:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support--Kürbis (✔) 19:26, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 23:20, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 23:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Godot13 (talk) 01:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Cj.samson (talk) 07:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 08:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral It lacks the wow because most of the church is hidden behind the trees. --NJR_ZA (talk) 09:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose It is a building with tree in front and a shadowy situation on snow arranged. Sorry.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Telemaque MySon. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:56, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per above, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the comments. In summer, the trees are much more disturbing (thanks to the leaves) and the church is surrounded by centuries-old trees (the first trees were planted at the cemetery in the 1710s), and there is no better angle. I think it's very relevant to show both the church and the cemetery in a single image, and a good illustration of the separate articles on the cemetery in Norwegian and Swedish Wikipedia. Snow is a part of life in Stockholm, sometimes we have snow from November to March. Personally, I like the beautiful winter light and colors here.--ArildV (talk) 22:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Due to foreground shadow, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 09:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - hmm, actually the shadow isn't that evil to me because it harmonizes with the dark nordic sky what makes the overall contrast still OK. However, let's be honest, it's "just" a good-quality photo of a building. For an FP, one may (and should!!) demand some more - here we have a nice winter scene, but a rather ordinary one; some of your other winter photos (like this one) have much more of special, as you probably will agree. Let's keep COM:FP a place for that special pictures. --A.Savin 22:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Stas1995 (talk) 07:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture