Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jurgis Kairys Su-31 Góraszka 5950.JPG

File:Jurgis Kairys Su-31 Góraszka 5950.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2010 at 21:39:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jurgis Kairys Su-31 Góraszka 5950.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jurgis Kairys Su-31 Góraszka 5950.JPG

•  Info created by Łukasz Golowanow & Maciej Hypś - uploaded and nominated by Wolf (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too far --217.10.38.139 05:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

  please log in --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Impressive. Yann (talk) 09:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support perhaps someone could make it better, but I find it featured --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Main subject too small. —kallerna™ 14:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Just to make it clear, the intention was not to take a photo of the airplane. The "artist's" intention was to show a small, man-made vehicle against the vastness of the sky. Wolf (talk) 15:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Strong support Nice photo as is. Even pilot inside is good visible --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor composition Steven Walling 23:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
•  Support per Wolf's comment - it does that. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:09, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Subject too small. Everyone knows how vast the sky is. --99of9 (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Are you sure you know it? Wolf (talk) 09:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
    • I know it's vaster than this picture shows . --99of9 (talk) 10:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Kallerna --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 12:35, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose As others - small subject. --Karel (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Basik07 (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose　As other --池田正樹 23:31,5 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am aware of the difficulties of taking a picture of a fast moving object out of another fast moving object. But it has been done much better by others. This pic is lacking in sharpness and lighting which is a pitty as the picture itself looks nice. May be you have another chance to try this again? Zapyon (talk) 11:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I beg your pardon, what do you mean by "another fast moving object"? Wolf (talk) 11:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very good image!--Mbz1 (talk) 04:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 03:20, 9 March 2010 (UTC)