Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jardin du Palais-Royal 01.jpg

File:Jardin du Palais-Royal 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2011 at 02:17:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jardin du Palais-Royal 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jardin du Palais-Royal 01.jpg

•  Info created by Evocateur (Flickr) - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 (talk) 02:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 02:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment -- Why didn't you tell those pidgeons to GTFO? lol -- IdLoveOne (talk) 05:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Since I don´t see any reason for focus that serves a purpose in this image, I´m going to oppose because of lack of DOF. (other reasons can be found, like noise below the thigh of the statue, tight composition, and the doves IdLoveOne mentioned erlier, but I´m not opposing because any of those.) --Snaevar (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Hmm, but does the image really need DOF? The background is just trees. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Well, it´s not absolutely crucial, but important none the less. Statues are placed on locations with careful consideration of their environment (including the trees). Also, how easily a good DOF and focus can be executed makes this image ordinary for me. Keep in mind, that there are images on Commons of statues that do satisfy this requirement and if I wouldn´t oppose on grounds like these, then probably all statue images would get my support vote, witch would not exactly give the desired effect.--Snaevar (talk) 13:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Pretty good but the one on the head is annoying to me. The other two almost make the statue seem life-like. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 09:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Jujutacular ^talk 07:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)