Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japanese peony pivoine JdP.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Japanese peony pivoine JdP.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2011 at 16:48:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by (helped) Lady Nature, and me -- Jebulon (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Spring is back in Europe ! Let's celebrate it with this japanese peony flower.-- Jebulon (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comment yes, the spring is back :-D Just sunshine the last days and at the following days. And I can't get to any photo motives :-( But to the picture: It's imo a little bit oversharpened and there's a sharpening halo. The composition is also centered and therefore somewhat boring. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree that centered is instantly boring, but the plain sunlight on this kind of is. This same flower might've been more interesting if the natural lighting were a bit darker, like as the Sun was setting and with a nice contrast. I still think it's pretty good otherwise. Kind of looks QI-ish somehow. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 04:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Plain sunlight ? Paris, 18 april, 16h40 local time, even under sunny weather...--Jebulon (talk) 10:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, but I wouldn't have known if you hadn't told me. Just looking at the picture it could be any time of day. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 04:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- geolocation and metadata are available on the file description page, which is generally extremely useful for complete reviews... ;) --Jebulon (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- Jebulon, almost every flower in the world in almost any garden in the world looks kind of like this at high noon. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 05:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, Weak support technically ok except for the clipping. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 02:25, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Plain sunlight ? Paris, 18 april, 16h40 local time, even under sunny weather...--Jebulon (talk) 10:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree that centered is instantly boring, but the plain sunlight on this kind of is. This same flower might've been more interesting if the natural lighting were a bit darker, like as the Sun was setting and with a nice contrast. I still think it's pretty good otherwise. Kind of looks QI-ish somehow. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 04:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose What makes that flower featurable? --Yikrazuul (talk) 08:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Is this question a "review" ? Maybe exceptionnal beauty (IMO)... Some could be sensitive to that. Matter of taste I suppose.--Jebulon (talk) 10:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Centered compostion and the stamens of the flower looks over-sharpened, ruining the mother nature feel of the picture for me.--Snaevar (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Sorry Jebulon but something is really missing in this photo for being featurable. Beyond that, there are three things I deslike: the tight crop, the too harsh lighting and the distracting background. You should have used a longer focal distance to get a blurred background with a nice bookeh. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- -No need to be sorry. I don't agree with all you say in this review but it is interesting to me. Thank you anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 07:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Mediocre quality. • Richard • [®] • 12:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Boring composition. theMONO 04:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC))