Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jambiya.jpg

File:Jambiya.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2010 at 00:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jambiya.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jambiya.jpg

•  Info created by User:bgag - uploaded by User:bgag - nominated by User:bgag -- Bgag (talk) 00:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bgag (talk) 00:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- Mulazimoglu (talk) 17:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

* OpposeThe object itself is really featurable, because of quality and high EV. But the background is really ugly, dirty (dust), and noisy. But sure I'll support with a good and solid black masking.--Jebulon (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment I have imported a new picture with a better background. --Bgag (talk) 01:09, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Support now, it is much better IMO. Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Given changes to background. Jujutacular ^talk 05:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Zhuk (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Weak support Good, but the knife seems a little dead just lying on its side. I think it would be more interesting rotated 90° or 120° anticlockwise. --Avenue (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support although I think a little better description of this particular Jambiya would be helpful. --FieldMarine (talk) 11:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Ggia (talk) 19:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- A blood stain on the blade would be a nice touch... Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--shizhao (talk) 12:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 21:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose dirty cutout at the bottom right. Could 1000x better if it had a nice background. No sense for composition. --Niabot (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Support The picture is perfect for encyclopedic purposes. It's not a composition contest. It's a picture that most perfectly represents the object.sorry no anonymous votes --Jebulon (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Agree with this anonymous comment.--Jebulon (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Conditional oppose The photo is fine, but we need for information on the file page about this particular Jambiya. Adds value. Most important would be a description of the hilt material, which is an important (and price determining) aspect of the dagger. Also, what is the blade made of? If these data are added I will be happy to support. --Slaunger (talk) 14:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
  • The blade is of steel but I don't have more information about the hilt except it is made of hard wood. I have added this information in the description. --Bgag (talk) 01:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
    •  Support Thank you for adding what you know. It was not evident for me that the hilt was made of hard wood, so although it is not very precise, you have still added value to the file page. --Slaunger (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects