Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iziko Koekoe resistance beacon.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Iziko Koekoe resistance beacon.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2014 at 12:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Nkansahrexford - uploaded by Nkansahrexford - nominated by Nkansahrexford -- Nkansahrexford (talk) 12:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Nkansahrexford (talk) 12:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Rberchie (talk) 12:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Not eligible for FPC voting. --A.Savin 13:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)- Support -- Leutha (talk) 13:02, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Fail to see any featurable content or quality. --A.Savin 13:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Question Savin, what about this image would have made this image featurable and of quality?
- Oppose Interesting subject... but uneven lighting and unsharp. --Cayambe (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The lighting is a one source light from above, thus the uneven nature of its look. Quality? Its 20mp image. Which part of the image lacks sharpness? In the museum with their limited light sources and the beacon secured in a glass cage, this happens to be the closest to best I could achieve with my camera.
- The lighting would not really be a problem for me. Uneven lighting in this case enhances the readability. The image *is* unsharp, however. View the image at full resolution to see. Kleuske (talk) 08:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The lighting is a one source light from above, thus the uneven nature of its look. Quality? Its 20mp image. Which part of the image lacks sharpness? In the museum with their limited light sources and the beacon secured in a glass cage, this happens to be the closest to best I could achieve with my camera.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 12:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC)