Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Interior of the Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Interior of the Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2023 at 23:56:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
✓ Done Poco a poco, please take another look and tell me if its ok for you. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 11:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO you went too far, but definitely better than before. Which SW did you use? Topaz? The denoising+sharpening looks better than I expected that's why I opposed right away. I go now for  Neutral Poco a poco (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Poco a poco I made everything from scratch, it should look better now. I use Topaz Denoise, I think it is the best noise eliminator out there, although I always upload a version without any denoise because I know that in the future there will be better software --Wilfredor (talk) 19:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek While Diliff's cathedral photographs, leveraging advanced nodal techniques, set an industry benchmark, my use of the same nodal system ensures technical precision in my images. The elimination of parallax errors through this system validates the technical competence of my photography, even if not at Diliff's acclaimed level and yes, no one reaches the Diliff level, maybe Colin--Wilfredor (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There have been great cathedral interior photos by several other users. I don't question your technical competence at all, but I wish you could have gotten more consistent sharpness on the left side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The cloth on the altar looks overexposed, is it so? We can see a hint of a cross in the centre of it, and two smaller marks(?) either side, but none of the detail due to the bright whiteness. Could this be fixed? BigDom (talk) 05:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done BigDom Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 07:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, looks good. I take Ikan's point about the comparisons to other cathedral photographers, but I think this is easily good enough for the star on its own merit, even if the sharpness isn't the absolute pinnacle achieved by others. Personally, I prefer the lighting on the ceiling in this version compared to the alt, so happy to  Support now. BigDom (talk) 09:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alt[edit]

Excuse my oversight. If it's not too much trouble, may I kindly request your esteemed guidance on the appropriate corrective measures for the error in this FPC, rather than solely its identification? Your expertise and assistance are invaluable to me, and I am most grateful for your time and consideration --Wilfredor (talk) 02:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada