Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Interior of the Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Interior of the Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2023 at 23:56:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support Top Wilfredor's quality as usual. ★ 00:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
OpposeSorry, ArionStar, but I disagree with you. There is too much noise and detail is rather low due to shallow DoF Poco a poco (talk) 11:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)- No problem. I appreciate the diversity of opinions. ★ 11:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done Poco a poco, please take another look and tell me if its ok for you. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 11:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- IMHO you went too far, but definitely better than before. Which SW did you use? Topaz? The denoising+sharpening looks better than I expected that's why I opposed right away. I go now for Neutral Poco a poco (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Poco a poco I made everything from scratch, it should look better now. I use Topaz Denoise, I think it is the best noise eliminator out there, although I always upload a version without any denoise because I know that in the future there will be better software --Wilfredor (talk) 19:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- IMHO you went too far, but definitely better than before. Which SW did you use? Topaz? The denoising+sharpening looks better than I expected that's why I opposed right away. I go now for Neutral Poco a poco (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done Poco a poco, please take another look and tell me if its ok for you. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 11:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Strong support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 07:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support - Princess 🍵 Rosalina 35188 07:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Unbalanced crop, sorry. 20 upper 09:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Oppose for now, sorry.I wanted to support this beautiful photograph, but while I enjoyed the details I stumbled over two irritating stitching errors at the leftmost and at the rightmost column (see image note). Could you please fix them? Sorry again and thank you very much! --Aristeas (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2023 (UTC)- Done Thank you for pointing that out, Aristeas. I've gone ahead and corrected the issue you mentioned. My apologies for the oversight and I truly appreciate your keen observation and willingness to bring it to my attention. This helps improve the quality of the photograph. Thank you again for your support and feedback my dear. Warm regards. Wilfredor (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support Wow, that was fast! Thank you very much, Wilfredor; I am really happy to support your beautiful photograph! --Aristeas (talk) 15:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out. While I understand the promptness might suggest otherwise, I assure you that I did not employ any AI tool in this process. What you witnessed was a product of manual effort. It is my accumulated experience and expertise that enabled me to complete it swiftly. It's so cool having someone like you around. Thanks for everything and hope we keep rocking this together :) Wilfredor (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your understanding and the nice words! Yes, working together we can make our photographs even better. --Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out. While I understand the promptness might suggest otherwise, I assure you that I did not employ any AI tool in this process. What you witnessed was a product of manual effort. It is my accumulated experience and expertise that enabled me to complete it swiftly. It's so cool having someone like you around. Thanks for everything and hope we keep rocking this together :) Wilfredor (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support Wow, that was fast! Thank you very much, Wilfredor; I am really happy to support your beautiful photograph! --Aristeas (talk) 15:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done Thank you for pointing that out, Aristeas. I've gone ahead and corrected the issue you mentioned. My apologies for the oversight and I truly appreciate your keen observation and willingness to bring it to my attention. This helps improve the quality of the photograph. Thank you again for your support and feedback my dear. Warm regards. Wilfredor (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I love this cathedral, and this is a very good photo, but I find myself missing the consistent sharpness of photos by people like Diliff. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek While Diliff's cathedral photographs, leveraging advanced nodal techniques, set an industry benchmark, my use of the same nodal system ensures technical precision in my images. The elimination of parallax errors through this system validates the technical competence of my photography, even if not at Diliff's acclaimed level and yes, no one reaches the Diliff level, maybe Colin--Wilfredor (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- There have been great cathedral interior photos by several other users. I don't question your technical competence at all, but I wish you could have gotten more consistent sharpness on the left side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek While Diliff's cathedral photographs, leveraging advanced nodal techniques, set an industry benchmark, my use of the same nodal system ensures technical precision in my images. The elimination of parallax errors through this system validates the technical competence of my photography, even if not at Diliff's acclaimed level and yes, no one reaches the Diliff level, maybe Colin--Wilfredor (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The cloth on the altar looks overexposed, is it so? We can see a hint of a cross in the centre of it, and two smaller marks(?) either side, but none of the detail due to the bright whiteness. Could this be fixed? BigDom (talk) 05:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done BigDom Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 07:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks good. I take Ikan's point about the comparisons to other cathedral photographers, but I think this is easily good enough for the star on its own merit, even if the sharpness isn't the absolute pinnacle achieved by others. Personally, I prefer the lighting on the ceiling in this version compared to the alt, so happy to Support now. BigDom (talk) 09:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done BigDom Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 07:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Alu (talk) 09:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Alt[edit]
- Info I would like to propose this version, finxing and based on the comments of Poco a poco and Ikan Kekek --Wilfredor (talk) 07:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this version. Still not at Diliff level, but I think it deserves a star. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment You said you was going to be careful and not make the coding mistake when creating 'Alt' that you always do. Yet here you are, three days later, making the same mistake again. This is the last time I rescue one of your noms from this. --Cart (talk) 17:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Excuse my oversight. If it's not too much trouble, may I kindly request your esteemed guidance on the appropriate corrective measures for the error in this FPC, rather than solely its identification? Your expertise and assistance are invaluable to me, and I am most grateful for your time and consideration --Wilfredor (talk) 02:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Princess 🍵 Rosalina 19776 06:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support Great too! ★ 12:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support - ABAL1412🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺 (talk ☭) 17:39, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada
The chosen alternative is: File:Intérieur de la Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré, Quebéc, Canada.jpg