Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Interior Árbol de Navidad -- 2013 -- Puerta del Sol, Madrid, España.jpg

File:Interior Árbol de Navidad -- 2013 -- Puerta del Sol, Madrid, España.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2014 at 21:55:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Interior Árbol de Navidad -- 2013 -- Puerta del Sol, Madrid, España.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Interior Árbol de Navidad -- 2013 -- Puerta del Sol, Madrid, España.jpg

•  Info created by J.Ligero & I.Barrios - uploaded by Alurín - nominated by Alurín -- Alurín (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alurín (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment -- great concept but why not symmetrical?
  •  Comment -- better now??--Alurín (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I like it very much, but the lack of symmetry is a bit annoying. Is there a way to rotate the picture abut 35 degrees in ccw direction (without loosing half of the image)? If not, do you have another version with better symmetry? Poco² 14:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per Poco.--Jebulon (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Vert (talk) 20:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment When I took the picture, I fix my attention on the four cut simmetrical balls and on the vertical radius. I see symmetrical the image. I think that it's a matter of perspective. However, if more people want I rotate it, I will do, but with loosing a part of the image.--Alurín (talk) 10:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support and please do not rotate. I think the image would lose some tension if you aligned the main axes to the image borders or diagonals, so please don't. Lupo 17:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I usually like symmetry and I don't like comments but I agree with Lupo : an effort to improve symmetry would suppress all the "movement" of the picture imo. --JLPC (talk) 22:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Exactly. I agree with your last comments. Thanks. --Alurín (talk) 00:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment The image is (pretty much) symmetric, just point and not axis...--DXR (talk) 07:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Quite striking. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 22:18, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors