Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Impatiens scapiflora.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2009 at 17:32:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Cj.samson - uploaded by Cj.samson - nominated by Cj.samson -- Cj.samson (talk) 17:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cj.samson (talk) 17:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Technically perfect, but uninteresting. Would probably do better as a Valued or Quality Image. -- JovanCormac 07:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Subject is sharp and good colour, however the background is distracting, particularly the right side (could be cloned out, but may be neutral at that point as FP, maybe QI though). --Relic38 (talk) 12:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work --ka ʁs tn 13:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technically unconvincing (a bit oversharpened) but a nice botanical specimen and IMO a very pleasing composition. Lycaon (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Lycaon --Muhammad (talk) 17:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality and composition IMO not sufficient for FP. I would prefer a point of view so that the inner parts of the flower are visible. --NEUROtiker ^⇌ 19:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Navigation menu