Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ISR-2013-Jerusalem-Holy Sepulchre-dome.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:ISR-2013-Jerusalem-Holy Sepulchre-dome.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2014 at 01:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Godot13 -- Godot13 (talk) 01:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Godot13 (talk) 01:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. Yann (talk) 12:39, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Nice, still there is a bit of red CA and I believe that the exposure was a bit too long (how long actually?) Poco2 20:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- It is faint but I see the CA. I will work on it when I get home. The exposure was 9 seconds (an eternity with tour groups on the move).--Godot13 (talk) 21:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Most of the CA removed.-Godot13 (talk) 22:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- It is faint but I see the CA. I will work on it when I get home. The exposure was 9 seconds (an eternity with tour groups on the move).--Godot13 (talk) 21:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. --DXR (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --El Grafo (talk) 11:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
* Oppose this kind of picture needs a perfect centering, this is not the case. I find the colors a bit strange.--Jebulon (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support but I feel that the colors could be a bit more vivid --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support I change my vote after a new thought. Sharpness is really excellent, and my previous comments were not enough for a serious oppose.--Jebulon (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support I'm not sure if I'm voting for the picture or for the subject! Probably for both! Quality is notexcellent but I suppose it would have been very difficult to do better, giving the difficult conditions. Not very common to see a professional camera around! A shame that the Exif info is not shown. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support I thought it was picture of a plate at first. Then I read the title. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 08:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors