Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Humayun's Tomb, Delhi, India 2019.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Humayun's Tomb, Delhi, India 2019.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2019 at 04:39:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
- Info Humayun's tomb is the tomb of the Mughal Emperor Humayun in Delhi, India. Image by Eatcha -- Eatcha (talk) 04:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Eatcha (talk) 04:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Question - Isn't this the same file that was voted down in April, 2019? It looks like it is. And the vote was 5 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral. So why are you renominating it now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- yes, It's the same file. I believe that it had the potential to be a FP but because of my lack of experience it failed, later w.cart cloned out the leaves and ... As you mentioned it was rejected by 5-6-1(
rejected due to lack of 3 support votes) , IMO it's worth giving a second try. --Eatcha (talk) 07:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC) - Oppose - OK, if that's what you want to do. I still think the sides are not sharp enough for FP, especially the left side. After all, it's the exact same photo I already said that about. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Also, please keep in mind, with 6 votes against, you'd need at least 12 supporting votes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oops, I had a notion of 2/3(total votes) as I nominated here after months. Thanks for the rectification. -- Eatcha (talk) 08:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Also, please keep in mind, with 6 votes against, you'd need at least 12 supporting votes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Oversharpened (strong sharpening artifacts in central part), sides still unsharp. Pity, it’s really a nice view and lighting and definitely has wow, but the image quality is too far below FP level. Sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 11:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per my vote last time. It deserves QI now, at least, but it is lacking in detail at full-res (see how blocky the grass looks), and there are visible sharpening haloes around the building. Additionally I still think it looks oversaturated, though not as much as before. It's a beautiful building but I think an FP of it should be a little better than this. Cmao20 (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination per reasons above. -- Eatcha (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)