Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hohenschwangau - Schloss Neuschwanstein1.jpg

File:Hohenschwangau - Schloss Neuschwanstein1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2011 at 14:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hohenschwangau - Schloss Neuschwanstein1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hohenschwangau - Schloss Neuschwanstein1.jpg

•  Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. Steven Walling 19:45, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 20:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is a standard shot we have a dozen of, and another version from a slightly better angle and less flat light has been already featured . --ELEKHH^T 00:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
  • I disagree, I find this angle more impressive. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 04:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support It's interesting to have a candidate so directly comparable to an existing FP. I picked through both versions, here are my inclinations:

• The two pics have very similar resolution, disappointingly small given that this is such a standard shot, why not use the whole sensor / not downsample?
• Both have similar sharpness.
• The angles are so very similar that I can't say which I think is better.
• This one has better lighting IMO, although it is more "flat", it shows better detail on the wall facing left. I find the shadows too strong in the other version.
• This one has less pine trees obscuring the castle. Amazing that they've cut so many down, presumably for this reason?

So, this one has my support, and if it gets up, I think the other should be delisted. --99of9 (talk) 04:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Now we have an FP more by this motif. --Ritchyblack (talk) 07:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support per 99of9's arguments, but I don't think that the other should be delisted. Irgendwann muss ich auch unbedingt mal zu diesem Schloss hoch... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 08:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I prefer this version, I don't like the shadows in the other FP, perhaps we can delist and replace the old one.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  10:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with 99of9. --Phyrexian ɸ 18:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support toll --Böhringer (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support —stay (sic)! 05:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Citron (talk) 12:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Gamaliel (talk) 22:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Galandil (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support   • Richard • [®] • 21:40, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture