Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hermetia illucens Black soldier fly.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Hermetia illucens Black soldier fly.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2010 at 17:58:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Muhammad (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. I've got a question: what is that white thing under it's wing? --Von.grzanka (talk) 21:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what it is called but all flies have it. I think User:Lycaon might know. --Muhammad (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Are these en:Halteres? --Von.grzanka (talk) 11:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks --Muhammad (talk) 13:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Are these en:Halteres? --Von.grzanka (talk) 11:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what it is called but all flies have it. I think User:Lycaon might know. --Muhammad (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great image. Please take the red-eye reduction mode in your flash-menu away. The original colour of the eye in this image is destroyed.--Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but the out of focus object in the foreground is very distracting in my opinion. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral Agree with Captain-tucker about the foreground but otherwise it is a good photopgraph. Bidgee (talk) 08:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per the two above. Wolf (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Informative picture. The out of focus foreground does not disturb me, and maybe even add to the quality of the pic. Eman (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose That foreground covers small part of one leg (and it's bit small), sorry. —kallerna™ 10:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Ack above. --Dori - Talk 01:31, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)