Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haukelitunellen ved Dyrskar.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Haukelitunellen ved Dyrskar.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2014 at 19:29:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Do you seriously think the other three experienced reviewers are just incompetent morons out to antagonize people? Your overturning an FPX and calling this a great image is absolutely infuriating, as it is so very unbelievable anyone would consider this a great picture. This image fails virtually every single criteria we seek in FP. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excuse me, why are you attacking my opinion when I did not attack anyone's opinion? I only voiced my own opinion as I find it meets the FP criteria, that's all. So this only enforces everyone's fear that there is no "free speech" to oppose when everyone else supports, just that in this case, it's the opposite situation. You are free to oppose, but please do not attack others' opinions. Thank you very much. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 03:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • FYI my policy is this. I respect your opinion(s) and I expect you to respect mine as well. But if you choose not to respect my opinion, or attack it, I may choose not to respect your opinion and/or attack yours as well. However, clarification and asking for more details of my opinion is fine. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 03:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is impossible to respect an opinion that has no foundation in reality. I have cordially discussed this penchant you have to make out of step arbitrary assessments based on personal preferences and this apparent need to assert your opinion against reasoned consensus. I am not the only one who has mentioned this either. Yet you persist despite our attempts to provide friendly counsel. The fact of the matter this image fails every criteria we set out for FPC yet you think it should be featured as one of our finest works. This opinion of yours was offered despite very obvious opposition from seasoned reviewers. That is why I cannot respect this vote of support. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry Saffron. I just thought about it and I think probably it isn't really top-class, "our best work", and suitable for FP. So I shall withdraw my vote. Earlier on, I promoted it to QI, and I think that's probably more suitable for this photo, compared to FP. If you have any opposition, you can open a discussion at the QI nomination. If no discussion is opened, I think it would be promoted tomorrow at 04:58 UTC. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 06:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Too many flaws (too dark, vignetting, haloes, no subject), lack of minimum quality, far under the FP standars, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.