Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hardhead Duck 1015.jpg

File:Hardhead Duck 1015.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2010 at 02:37:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hardhead Duck 1015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hardhead Duck 1015.jpg

•  Info created by gnuchris - uploaded by gnuchris - nominated by gnuchris -- Gnuchris (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gnuchris (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
• I remove my former FPX, since a new version >2MP has been uploaded. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 23:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
• I have uploaded a new version above 2MP can someone please change this so people can support my nomination Gnuchris (talk) 14:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support this truly great photo User: CathG Per FPC talk page discussion and poll -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Wow this really captures the beauty of this Duck, I see them all the time in Brisbane Botanic Gardens User: TravisWise Per FPC talk page discussion and poll -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support this photo is jizz-worthy; the HDR photo flatters the beauty of this fowl preening itself beside the famous City Botanic Gardens pond. absolutely lovely! User: leongmingen Per FPC talk page discussion and poll -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
  •  Question Alvesgaspar, thoughts about these votes, please ? --Jebulon (talk) 00:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support This is ducking amazing User: Jacklord Per FPC talk page discussion and poll -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support yeah this photo is off the hook Per FPC talk page discussion and poll -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I sense meatpuppetry, although the photo is nice. THENEWMONO (a real person) 04:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Please someone take care of this issue and ask for a checkuser, other than me. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

 Comment It seems fair to cancel the support above, I don't doubt their sincerity and I'm grateful for the support and feedback, the slang used gave me a chuckle. I think many highly talented photographers have looked at the photo and neither supported or opposed it. I'm not sure what that means.Gnuchris (talk)

•  Oppose Noisy and the top right corner is not in focus.--Snaevar (talk) 18:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much grain.--Garrondo (talk) 18:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

 Comment Thanks, I will fix the noise and grain over the weekend, I work for a company that does large format digital photographic printing, I pretty much print all day, it looks ok 1:1 but when magnified the noise and grain is noticeable though most people just look at the duck and dont stand super close to it. I dont really agree that the top right should be in focus.Gnuchris (talk)

•  Oppose Background very noisy, DoF problem. Strong and ugly horizontal disturbing line above--Jebulon (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)