Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hallig Hooge - Kirchwarft 2009-08.jpg

File:Hallig Hooge - Kirchwarft 2009-08.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2012 at 10:18:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hallig Hooge - Kirchwarft 2009-08.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hallig Hooge - Kirchwarft 2009-08.jpg

•  Info created & uploaded by Johamar - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and lighting, though IQ could be better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --heb [T C E] 13:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Alborzagros (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support very well --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support JKadavoor Jee 05:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --JDP90 (talk) 05:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Peter23 (talk) 12:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 12:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 17:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose (weak); very nice view for me, however, lacks detail, and there's some noise on the water. - A.Savin 22:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 00:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose (weak) The image is too tight for this house on top and bottom. I'd prefer the portrait orientation for this subject. Moreover, symmetrical compositions are boring. --Ximeg (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose The tilted plain is a bit distracting composition wise. Some lack of details as well. --Dey.sandip (talk) 20:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose obvious tilt (check reflections).  B.p. 22:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Well I don't find that tilt so obvious. Sure it can be corrected for a slightly tilted lens and maybe the horizon is of by one degreee. The fact remains that it is a lovely picture with a very nice reflection. (I have a soft spot for reflections) I think this is what people like to see when we are talking about featured pictures. - Uberprutser (talk) 18:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 16:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture