Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Groep bomen in verruigd biotoop. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 05.jpg

File:Groep bomen in verruigd biotoop. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 05.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 15:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Groep bomen in verruigd biotoop. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 05.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Groep bomen in verruigd biotoop. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 05.jpg

3127

1606

561

391

5041

3011

colour mosaic

I think, its repaired now --Hubertl 06:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Trees.
•  Info Group of trees in overgrown habitat. Location, Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy, unsharp, and numerous mosaicing errors (parts of grass blades being all green or purple). Certainly it’s a nice atmosphere but that alone does not make it featurable for me. --Kreuzschnabel 16:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 18:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - I'm not seeing the mosaicing errors Kreuzschnabel sees (I actually don't know what "mosaicing" is), and none of the unsharpness bothers me, as what I'm seeing is in no way excessive and caused by haze and motion blur. But the overall composition is great, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 19:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I think I need another year’s holiday of FPC. I start to see things others cannot see. Btw, mosaicing is one of the basic concepts of digital photography. Have fun. --Kreuzschnabel 21:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - I Googled the term. Seems to be another (more formal?) name for stitching. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - By the way, it's totally fine for you to take a vacation from here if you like, but I hope it's not too long because I appreciate the views you express here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  CommentSee en:Demosaicing. I put an annotation on the nomination site, there’s a clearly visible green-and-purple pattern in the grass caused by interference of these details and the sensor matrix. Won’t look nice when printed. --Kreuzschnabel 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

• @Kreuzschnabel: You're not seeing ghosts, it's there. But you have to look for it at 100% zoom, so that alone probably wouldn't be enough for an oppose for me. However, I'm not really wowed by it either, tending towards a  weak oppose --El Grafo (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I applied a color luminance correction. I think, it´s ok now. (you can make it either with the camera raw filter from Photoshop or with Lightroom, I did it with Photoshop. But I think it may be same procedure and algorithm. --Hubertl 06:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

• Jep, looks much better now. Struck my oppose above, moving to  Neutral --El Grafo (talk) 08:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@Hubertl and Hubertl: . Thank you for your correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)