Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Greenwich Foot Tunnel, Greenwich side.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Greenwich Foot Tunnel, Greenwich side.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Aug 2013 at 10:58:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by me. Heuschrecke (talk) 10:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Support Good light and outstanding composition in my opinion. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 20:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Question Julian, could you describe what is outstanding with the composition in your view? Probably there is something I oversee. --Tuxyso (talk) 00:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- I meant the fact that the foreground subject is located nicely off-center, the rest of the foreground space is filled with a nice balance of grass and paved ground and the space that is then free left of the building shows the Thames, the slowly rising building size on the Isle of Dogs all the way to the skyline of Canary Wharf. This way, I think it shows where the tunnel leads to, the only downside being that the other end of the tunnel is not visible. Maybe "outstanding" is too much, but I like it very much. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 08:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- May I add that lighting is indeed somewhat special: despite the cloudy day, the sun came out of the clouds behind me for a minute - hence the smooth glossy look of the roof and the Canary Wharf buildings. Photos that I've done before the sun came out do not share this quality. Heuschrecke (talk) 09:54, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- That is true, although I would think that this would almost be more effective with the white balance being a little more shadow-oriented (warmer). — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 11:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your in-detail information. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- That is true, although I would think that this would almost be more effective with the white balance being a little more shadow-oriented (warmer). — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 11:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- May I add that lighting is indeed somewhat special: despite the cloudy day, the sun came out of the clouds behind me for a minute - hence the smooth glossy look of the roof and the Canary Wharf buildings. Photos that I've done before the sun came out do not share this quality. Heuschrecke (talk) 09:54, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- I meant the fact that the foreground subject is located nicely off-center, the rest of the foreground space is filled with a nice balance of grass and paved ground and the space that is then free left of the building shows the Thames, the slowly rising building size on the Isle of Dogs all the way to the skyline of Canary Wharf. This way, I think it shows where the tunnel leads to, the only downside being that the other end of the tunnel is not visible. Maybe "outstanding" is too much, but I like it very much. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 08:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support (but can the bird at left be removed?) --Kadellar (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Done Removed gulls. Played with wb but could not find anything better. Heuschrecke (talk) 23:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— TintoMeches, 13:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
