Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Greece Cape Sounion BW 2017-10-09 10-15-16.jpg

File:Greece Cape Sounion BW 2017-10-09 10-15-16.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2019 at 07:44:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Greece Cape Sounion BW 2017-10-09 10-15-16.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Greece Cape Sounion BW 2017-10-09 10-15-16.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
•  Info created by Berthold Werner - uploaded by Berthold Werner - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful, and a valuable closeup at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Well composed. Charles (talk) 09:02, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 09:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

* Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:58, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose, per below, stitching errors, bad cloning at the lower left, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Something has gone wrong at the very left edge. --A.Savin 12:02, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment and at the right side as well.--Ermell (talk) 12:36, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you for your hints, I cropped the erroneous parts. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

*  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per below --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment On the lower left you can still see the processing with the clone stamp. Especially the repeating fence doesn't fit here at all.--Ermell (talk) 19:51, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:39, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment It's very nice but there are technical shortcomings. The issue Ermell mentioned, but also quite a few stitching errors (check the fence) and there is a problem on the right where the fence just vanishes. Will support once these are fixed. -- B2Belgium (talk) 21:41, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perhaps one could wish for a bit more of an interesting sky, but on the whole there's not much here that could have been done better. Great work. Cmao20 (talk) 00:27, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 04:55, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per A.Savin and Ermell. There is a really disturbing cloned area. Sorry but not even a QI at this time IMO. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are still some very important problems, mainly at the bottom left, but also at other places -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:33, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose unfortunately per Christian --Cart (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Really nice composition but too many technical shortcomings, not even QI for me. The cloned-up areas (at least lower left and lower right corners) are obvious and far from well-done. Numerous stitching issues in the wire fence. --Kreuzschnabel 11:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Yes, there are too much errors in this picture. Thanks at all for the hints and the supports. --Berthold Werner (talk)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 02:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)