Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geckos mating.jpg

File:Geckos mating.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2017 at 03:01:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Geckos mating.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geckos mating.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
•  Info created by Basile Morin - uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - I like it, but the photo is a bit small. Also, could you improve the sharpness a bit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting, but too unsharp for this small resolution. --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry fo above --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: and Uoaei1, it's a QI already. So now the question is to know if the subject is interesting or not, I think.

• No, I don't agree with this. The standards of quality for a Quality Image in practice are not the same as they are for one of the most outstanding images on the site, which is what an FP is supposed to be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

• • @Livioandronico2013: I don't understand, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image is not sharp enough and the resolution is too low. Besides, the crop could be better. But the topic is certainly interesting.--Ermell (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Info Extremely rare close-up photo of a reptile penetration, so exceptional, quite impossible to obtain in normal conditions, especially when you know how wild these animals are, so educative picture, extremely explicit, quality okay (by night, with a natural light, through a window, of course not in the hand), and then, please explain how you would find better. -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beyond the conditions for taking this photograph, circumstantial elements and the subjectivism expressed by the author. Unsharp and heavy color noise, exif image information is not present, low quality on image retouch on the subject animal border and the background, not show clearly that the animals are in the wild. --The Photographer 15:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

No exif ? Old camera. Captivity ! Seriously ? - Basile Morin (talk) 15:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Dear Basile Morin, please assume good faith and don't take the comments personally. Remember that when you post a photo candidature here you agree to accept criticism and respond politely. --The Photographer 15:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not quite sharp enough for me, and the lighting is not ideal.--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination Basile Morin (talk) 13:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)