Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gibraltar Airport panorama.jpg

File:GIB 2007-09-18.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2009 at 21:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:GIB 2007-09-18.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:GIB 2007-09-18.jpg

•  Info created by Nervousenergy - uploaded by Nervousenergy - nominated by Avala -- Avala (talk) 21:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nicely done and it is a very interesting panorama for a change, not just many images stitched together for no reason -- Avala (talk) 21:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Looks cool, the resolution could have been higher though. /Daniel78 (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, very different from the usual panoramas. --Aqwis (talk) 23:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I love this. The angle, the setting, the crisp detail and of course, the unusual sight of a plane taking off in 5 stages...it's exactly what I want to see in a panorama. Great work Nervousenergy, and a nice find Avala. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 23:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral This panorama is awesome. I'd support if there was a higher resolution (not downsampled), which is probably easily achievable given the very low vertical size (800px) -S23678 (talk) 23:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting at first look, but resolution is too low and crop on top too tight IMO. -- JovanCormac 07:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting time-lapse. Great picture. I don't think there is any resolution problem. There is not need of artifical addition of pixels where they don't exist (which is the case of many photographs here) -- Blago Tebi (talk) 10:58, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive! Diti the penguin — 14:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Question - It has some over expsure / apperture in the most left part (not the sky, but in the buildings below). Can that be fixed without the need to retake the picture again? - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 09:31, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
  • I don't think that retaking the image would give you any different results. It is the combination of sea fog and sun that creates haze and if you want to include that part of the city in an image I doubt you would ever have different results at this time of the day. Maybe it wouldn't be noticeable if there wasn't for the part of panorama on the right, but these are essentially different images as they were taken under different light and geographic conditions.--Avala (talk) 12:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Great view, high quality --Cesco77 (talk) 10:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Leafnode✉ 22:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, --Vprisivko (talk) 14:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 05:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 14:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Gorgeous. 99of9 (talk) 11:33, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Great idea to make such a picture. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikiwaner (talk) 19:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles#Air