Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuwafuwa-chan.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Fuwafuwa-chan.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2011 at 20:08:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Drawn Young Girl in Sukumizu
You have been bullying niabot like a lower grade. And removing his RFC from commons FPC is the behaviour of a fucking prick [2]. Do not at any circumstances tell me how to behave Dickhead! --Paddy (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hard words, but to some point i have to agree. --Niabot (talk) 23:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info for dummies:
  1. I uploaded a new version of this image.
  2. It is not his arm, its her arm. But how can it be that some say the arms are at right length, some say that right arm is to short (which?) and others say that both are to short compared to human anatomy.
  3. Its a fictional character, not a human being. Length of arms and proportions may vary: [3], Manatsu Ikari, Nitroplus. Compare that to human anatomy...
  4. The spot moved as i moved the lensflares around. Maybe to soft to notice.
  5. I doubt, that it would not be educational. On the one hand you have the real life swimsuite and then you have it's depiction inside the media. So bad that EN is missing the corresponding article in which it could be used.
So far so good. I didn't expected anything else from "commons professionals"... --Niabot (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And what other, more mature attitude are we to expect from you ? --MAURILBERT (discuter) 15:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Did i mention anything about mature attitude? Im just criticizing the strong bias on FPC and that it is not worth anymore to make votings or contribute to Commons. Be happy with this image. It is my last one.
PS: Please archive this voting. Don't want to this or any other image of myself featured at commons anymore. --Niabot (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info -- Please use the "Withdraw" template if you really want to close this nomination. I don't think that this kind of agressive behavior against the reviewers contributes much for the mood of this forum. By the way, I see nobody using the expression "his arm" anywhere. Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thats because of this edit, where it is now the left arm. Very suspicious if you would ask me... "I don't see what is featurable here." is also such an great comment. That you have your fixed opinion and that you must already dislike me, should be clear. No wonder that others complain about Careless reviews --Niabot (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC) PS: I miss your comment on my reaction to your "careless" comment about human anatomy. But i guess you will handle it the same way like that. Right? --Niabot (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rule of thirds
Please read this page again. It has an section for images created by users called WP:OI.
Regarding composition: It uses the Rule of thirds as illustrated in the right image.
Where is crop tight? There is approximatley 1/3 space to top, left and right. The feets are fully shown and have room to the bottom. Less space of course. --Niabot (talk) 13:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whether I have right on my own opinion? Or I am obliged to support this candidate only ? Please, respect other opinion too. With best regards -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    We are not talking about your opinion. Niabot only proved that your argument is invalid. But nobody will tell you what to like or not. Maybe you have at least one valid argument? --Paddy (talk)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]