Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuwafuwa-chan.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Fuwafuwa-chan.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2011 at 20:08:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Niabot - uploaded by Niabot - nominated by Dr. Koto -- Dr. Koto (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Info This image represents a girl drawn in anime/manga style, wearing an old type sukumizu (DE|JA). Sukumizu is the short term for School Mizugi (スクール水着), a standard type of swimsuite. Even so the 'old type' isn't used in schools anymore, it is still a general theme for fan service, photo shoots, manga, anime and games.
- Support Dr. Koto (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Account with less than 50 edits, please check the rules. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- His global account is more than 2 years old and he has more than 1000 edits alone on WP:DE. [1] --Niabot (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Please read the rules, for God sake! Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Please read your own rules again. I cite it for you: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote.". No word about if this relates to commons only or global accounts. The only reason for this rule to exists is to avoid sock puppets. Which is clearly not the case. God damn, Jesus. --Niabot (talk) 19:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Rules were read now. I can't find such a rule. Voting of Dr. Koto reproduced. alofok* 19:25, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Please read the rules, for God sake! Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- His global account is more than 2 years old and he has more than 1000 edits alone on WP:DE. [1] --Niabot (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Account with less than 50 edits, please check the rules. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Paddy (talk) 20:24, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support nice illustration of style and subject (swimsuit). --Don-kun (talk) 20:47, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Not clearly educational – compare with other images from the category which show the subject better (like this), and note lack of use on other projects. Steven Walling 05:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comment The other images (done by myself) are referring to the actual swimsuit. This one to the topic, how it is displayed in media: de:School Mizugi --Niabot (talk) 17:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Good, but her left arm is very short.--Citron (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Pleasure to see such colors. I noted a dot-circle on rigth hand, is that part of it ? I didnt find her arm too short, i checked. --Mile (talk) 12:23, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose the swimsuit could be better drawn and the dot-circle on the left hand does not seem have any use, whatsoever.--Snaevar (talk) 12:53, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Below the current FP bar for this kind of illustration. Both arms are too short, according to human standards. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- In case you did not notice it is not a photo of a human being but a drawing of an animé character. But in in any case is a judgement failure. Consider to stop taking drugs or maybe take more/others. --Paddy (talk) 19:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Please consider to improve your gross behavior, which is not welcome here. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- You have been bullying niabot like a lower grade. And removing his RFC from commons FPC is the behaviour of a fucking prick [2]. Do not at any circumstances tell me how to behave Dickhead! --Paddy (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hard words, but to some point i have to agree. --Niabot (talk) 23:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Info for dummies:
- I uploaded a new version of this image.
- It is not his arm, its her arm. But how can it be that some say the arms are at right length, some say that right arm is to short (which?) and others say that both are to short compared to human anatomy.
- Its a fictional character, not a human being. Length of arms and proportions may vary: [3], Manatsu Ikari, Nitroplus. Compare that to human anatomy...
- The spot moved as i moved the lensflares around. Maybe to soft to notice.
- I doubt, that it would not be educational. On the one hand you have the real life swimsuite and then you have it's depiction inside the media. So bad that EN is missing the corresponding article in which it could be used.
- So far so good. I didn't expected anything else from "commons professionals"... --Niabot (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- And what other, more mature attitude are we to expect from you ? --MAURILBERT (discuter) 15:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Did i mention anything about mature attitude? Im just criticizing the strong bias on FPC and that it is not worth anymore to make votings or contribute to Commons. Be happy with this image. It is my last one.
- PS: Please archive this voting. Don't want to this or any other image of myself featured at commons anymore. --Niabot (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Info -- Please use the "Withdraw" template if you really want to close this nomination. I don't think that this kind of agressive behavior against the reviewers contributes much for the mood of this forum. By the way, I see nobody using the expression "his arm" anywhere. Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thats because of this edit, where it is now the left arm. Very suspicious if you would ask me... "I don't see what is featurable here." is also such an great comment. That you have your fixed opinion and that you must already dislike me, should be clear. No wonder that others complain about Careless reviews --Niabot (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC) PS: I miss your comment on my reaction to your "careless" comment about human anatomy. But i guess you will handle it the same way like that. Right? --Niabot (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- And what other, more mature attitude are we to expect from you ? --MAURILBERT (discuter) 15:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see what is featurable here. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 15:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Why not? alofok* 11:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Weak support It is a nicely drawn manga picture showing this suit, hence it gives a fresh perspective. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support fine work. alofok* 19:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral, comment: Hard to see what is positively feature-able about this. - Jmabel ! talk 01:06, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support technical perfect illustration, usable for articles. FPC should not be a board for moralizing. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:23, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Wladyslaw. Morality and art is an issue that has to be discussed in a general topic. Ggia (talk) 07:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice, but hardly educational. -- Bojan Talk 19:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose not featurable for me, sorry. -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Why not? alofok* 11:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Too centered composition, too tight crop. Also this artwork is rather original research -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Please read this page again. It has an section for images created by users called WP:OI.
- Regarding composition: It uses the Rule of thirds as illustrated in the right image.
- Where is crop tight? There is approximatley 1/3 space to top, left and right. The feets are fully shown and have room to the bottom. Less space of course. --Niabot (talk) 13:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Whether I have right on my own opinion? Or I am obliged to support this candidate only ? Please, respect other opinion too. With best regards -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. The only objection I have is that her right hand is bigger than left (most prominent on her little finger). --Lošmi (talk) 15:38, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version to fix this issue. --Niabot (talk) 17:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Cool :) --Lošmi (talk) 17:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version to fix this issue. --Niabot (talk) 17:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support nice. --Trycatch (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral I quite agree with Steven Wallingand not convinced if the FP is the most adapted, but not fully opposed. Totodu74 (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- OpposeNo educational value --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support As the author of this image, because a Sukumizu or School Mizugi (the (the one) articles don't exist in English language [shame on you ^^]) is an relevant topic for Japanese media. From "Swimsuit Magazines" (blamed to display minors) to computer games (Erogēs}) to Anime (the typical beach episode) and Manga this is a widespread and common theme in Japanese media. It usually depicts shy, Tsundere alike, or very introverted characters in this design of swimsuit. The actual swimsuit was invented around 1955 and has developed it's outer appearance over time. In Japanese media itself, the old style/type of swimsuit is still used, since it had some characteristic traits that all following successors could not reach. It's disadvantages where its strength, since this could be used to emphasize its cuteness (Kawaii), which is generally seen as a theme of beauty in Japan (in short: beauty = cuteness, not something else). -- /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ 苦情処理係 22:42, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Because Masur (talk) 06:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose no wow, boring. Multichill (talk) 08:44, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support Very good illustration. G.A.S 04:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose The arms are too short - just because some other drawers get it wrong too doesn't mean it looks good. I also find the composition a little dull (central girl in front of central post - reminiscent of the FPC just below this one: central monument in front of central building). --99of9 (talk) 14:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 8 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)