Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Friedländer Tor Neubrandenburg Haupttor Stadtseite.JPG

File:Friedländer Tor Neubrandenburg Haupttor Stadtseite.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2010 at 17:00:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Friedländer Tor Neubrandenburg Haupttor Stadtseite.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Friedländer Tor Neubrandenburg Haupttor Stadtseite.JPG

•  Info created by Horst-schlaemma - uploaded by Horst-schlaemma - nominated by Horst-schlaemma -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 17:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
• It is tilted and the bottom is cut off. Sorry, but this is unlikely to go anywhere. --Dschwen (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

   Info The interesting thing is: The building is tilted, not the photo. It's a Brick Gothic medieval city gate that dates back to the 14th century, keep that in mind! And the bottom is cut off intentionally, as there were construction works going on. Thanks for the response, anyway. Greets, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 17:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

  Ok, but the picture unfortunately does not convey that the tilt is due to the building. You need some kind of reference frame to show that. --Dschwen (talk) 18:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

  Sure, but what do you mean when talking about a "reference frame"? Greets, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 18:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

  The ground, buildings that are not tilted. --Dschwen (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

  Thank you. Greets, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Dschwen. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose not straight and perspective distortion --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -dislike composition and ligthing -LadyofHats (talk) 03:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Alternative

 Support Thanks for upping the alternative, Carschten. It indeed looks better, even though the original version doesn't show technical deficits but 'natural' ones. Greets, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 10:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose. That would be a double oppose now. If the gate is indeed tilted then this "correction" is now misleading. The bottom crop is still unacceptable. --Dschwen (talk) 17:06, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

•  Question What do other users think? -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 12:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)