Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fredmeyer edit 1.jpg

File:Fredmeyer edit 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2009 at 23:38:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fredmeyer edit 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fredmeyer edit 1.jpg

906

208

67

49

2790

1835

Wally! --S23678 (talk) 13:49, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Info created by lyzadanger (Flickr) - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 23:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment An interesting study of your typical supermarket; notice the huge amount of food, and the 2 people in there. A comment on our wastefulness? Jovan, I'm happy to say this is 5.12MP. Is that enough? :P
•  Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 23:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support A bit of noise, but great composition. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover, didn't you saw the third person? --S23678 (talk) 23:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment No, I didn't. I spotted the wet floor sign, but not the third gentleman. It's like a giant version of 'Where's Wally?'. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 23:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 00:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yes! Great picture (even though sharpness could be better; most of the labels are barely legible). -- JovanCormac 06:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Althought there is small quality problems. —kallerna™ 11:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice idea, but too noisy and a bit too blurry. --NEURO ^⇌ 12:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Actually the idea is plagiarized from [1].franklin.vp (talk) 00:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose- Nice shot, but far too much going on, and there's no defined subject. It's an odd angle as well, so at thumbnail (and indeed at full-resolution as well) all I can see is a mess of different colors. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:21, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
  • which is exactly the point of this picture, isn't it? --MAURILBERT (discuter) 15:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Perhaps. But it still isn't fit to be recognized as an FP in my honest opinion. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose this image can give a false impression that en:Andreas Gursky has donated his internationally acclaimed photo[2] to Wikipedia for free--Caspian blue 15:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
  •  Question How is that a concern? Simply because someone else has photographed a similar subject, we can't promote it? I'm not liking the slippery slope here... Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 21:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Plagiarism concern, not a slippery slope--Caspian blue 00:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support The composition and subject mitigate for some minor technical flaws. -- H005 23:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Blurry. - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 09:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As other opponents. --Karel (talk) 20:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Quality problems are too small for me to oppose. --Phyrexian (talk) 12:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose People on the right and blurry (maybe cut, smaller version will be better). D kuba (talk) 20:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikiwaner (talk) 20:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)