Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fontaine des Fleuves.jpg

File:Fontaine des Fleuves.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2012 at 21:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fontaine des Fleuves.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fontaine des Fleuves.jpg

•  Info created by Pierre-Louis Ferrer - uploaded by Pierre-Louis Ferrer - nominated by Danh -- Danh (talk) 21:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Danh (talk) 21:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 22:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose What a pity... the quality. The wow is huge, terrific image, very beautiful. But look, there is a lot of noise (avoidable, since exp time is long), there are many dead pixels all over the picture (not stars), big CA's, lots of Chromatic noise, and lens flare too, as if UV filter was left on. --Paolo Costa (talk) 01:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose + dust spots (drops?), + strong distortions. I see this fountain four times a day when I go to job, and I can say that I've never seen it so. Even for a night shot, the colors are completely artificial to me. This image was rejected in the Quality Image Candidates page and did not obtain the label...--Jebulon (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose all looks very artificial, but the tilt distortion of the Concorde obelisk is realy unpleasant to see IMO --Moonik (talk) 10:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose as other --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose the quality isn't OK for an FP-image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose As others--Miguel Bugallo 00:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Tomer T (talk) 11:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC)