Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fly Agaric mushroom 04 cropped.jpg

File:Fly Agaric mushroom 04 cropped.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2009 at 08:52:21

•  Info created by Tony Wills (cropped by Miraceti) - uploaded by Miraceti - nominated by Miraceti -- Miraceti (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support The image is a losslessly cropped version of already featured picture. It is cropped because the original composition was not the best in my opinion. It was also a point of several comments during its nomination. -- Miraceti (talk) 08:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Nice picture Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - --Farzaaaad2000 (talk) 09:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sidenote: It might have been better when you have presented the edit during the nomination. I don't like the centered composition. --Richard Bartz (talk) 10:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

  I do not understand. Where it should not be presented and where should?

I ment presenting the edit during this nomination, 3 weeks ago. When your edit get's featured (which I hope not), we have 2 identical FP's, where we have to delist a brandnew FP - which is strange. Why not withdraw this nomination and put your edit as --> |other_versions <-- into the image description ? here is a example--Richard Bartz (talk) 12:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

At that time, I did not know that image existed. I am not so interested in Commons. I founded it quite acccidently. Originally I just wanted to upload a better version as I did several times before. This was not possible since it is a FP.

It looks to me strange that worse version should be a FP and better one not. Miraceti (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

• I kept a pileus into a third line. The problem was with stipe. There is no much options where to put a single vertical line when the whole object is a shape of letter T. Miraceti (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't think this crop does actually look better (which is probably why I didn't simply do a close-up centred shot of the mushroom in the first place :-). The original composition isn't exactly perfect ;-), but I was trying to create a shot that showed as much detail (cap, gills, stalk/stipe, ring etc) as possible plus the context in which it was growing. Perhaps when my photographic education is more complete, I may appreciate your version more :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 03:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tony's is better and already featured. I don't understand this nomination. --S. Martín (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC).
•  Oppose Original was better. --James J. Ludemann (talk) 09:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, already featured. --Aqwis (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 5 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 15:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)