Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flisning av träskrot.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Flisning av träskrot.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2010 at 18:45:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by V-wolf -- V-wolf (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Abstain -- V-wolf (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 19:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Good technical quality. I like the actions with the fragmented wood dispersed in the air. I am not too convinced about the composition though. I would have gone closer to the ground to get some perspective in the dominance and drama of a big powerful machine, shredding wood. --Slaunger (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)- Oppose -- Nothing original here. Mulazimoglu (talk) 07:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Question How do you mean? The wood is real wood, the machines are real machines, the photo is not manipulated more than adjustments of levels and contrast . Everything you see is original, nothing added later. --V-wolf (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- I mean her we see wood machine etc. so what? Theres not an original theme.Mulazimoglu (talk) 10:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. I apologize for my misunderstanding. But as far as I can see, there are no UFO crashings or naked marching bands in your FP candidating pictures either. There are values in the everyday life as well. --V-wolf (talk) 11:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Concerning values in everyday life, I agree photos of this is important. Are you familiar with COM:VIC? --Slaunger (talk) 11:52, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- I am new here and sorry my English is poor. But i feel like here when you give an opposing vote people take it personally and pointing you as the one who is spoiling the party. Everyone must be objective. I see some people moving together in a kind of fellowship. Like give and get policy. Wish i could have said what i meant. Just objectivity. Thanks. Mulazimoglu (talk) 12:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- I have nothing against you, Ozgurmulazimoglu, and I respect your vote, but if there only were extraordinary subjects to be promoted, I believe we would have to stick with the outer space pictures from NASA. @Slaunger: Yes, I once promoted this picture to VIC with the scope woodchipping, but I took it back, because I realized this only depict woodchipping from wood litter (old chairs and boards), and maybe that's a too narrow scope. --V-wolf (talk) 13:41, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- I am new here and sorry my English is poor. But i feel like here when you give an opposing vote people take it personally and pointing you as the one who is spoiling the party. Everyone must be objective. I see some people moving together in a kind of fellowship. Like give and get policy. Wish i could have said what i meant. Just objectivity. Thanks. Mulazimoglu (talk) 12:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Concerning values in everyday life, I agree photos of this is important. Are you familiar with COM:VIC? --Slaunger (talk) 11:52, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. I apologize for my misunderstanding. But as far as I can see, there are no UFO crashings or naked marching bands in your FP candidating pictures either. There are values in the everyday life as well. --V-wolf (talk) 11:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose--shizhao (talk) 19:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support. --Спас Колев (talk) 08:02, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 22:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Neutral Quality's ok, but kind of snap-shotty. --IdLoveOne (talk) 02:51, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
