Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fitzroy Island.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Fitzroy Island.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2023 at 11:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fitzroy Island in Central Queensland, Australia
  • Basile, as Aristeas has explained here and here, there is no such thing as un uncalibrated Adobe RGB ICC profile. If your computer is not able to consistently display images that include an ICC profile (like this one), then something is wrong with your computer, not the image. Happy to help in sorting out that issue. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nothing is wrong with my excellent and recent (2021) high end laptop, in my opinion. It's subtile but very clear. Differences are noticeable when the two pictures are superimposed, one coming from a program, and the second from another. In this case the intense blue and turquoise probably come from a Polarizing filter. That increases the effect -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here's one thing you can try: put the two images side by side, grab a screenshot, open it on Photoshop, and use the colour picker to sample the same pixel on both images. If the RGB values are exactly the same, everything is working as it should. If not, I'm afraid you have an issue with your computer. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The problem is probably not the laptop, but the software configuration. Photoshop e.g. can be configured to handle colour spaces in many different way, many of them being dangerous and leading to a wrong display of colours. Adobe sometimes messes with the program settings during updates (I have experienced this myself), so it is at least possible that even without our knowledge the software is configured in a wrong way. Julesvernex2’s suggestion is as simple as recommendable. --Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Guys, 2 tests made: 1) The original AdobeRGB, 2) The same file converted sRGB.
Conclusions: Very clearly different colors displayed on Chrome and Photoshop when the file is AdobeRGB, and exactly the same colors displayed on Chrome and Photoshop when the file is sRGB. It's so funny that I made the expected observations with this method you both suggest! To be sure, I made the same test with one of my RAW, the first one processed in sRGB and the second in AdobeRGB.
Sorry guys, but if you intended to convert somone to your weird speculations, it's completely failed, lol. Believe my good faith. After your insistance, I honestly started to suppose that maybe something could be discovered, but on the contrary, these observations confirm my personal feeling: better to avoid AdobeRGB (for the web) and opt for sRGB instead. Info: My Photoshop is properly calibrated sRGB.
Now, the good news after all these time-consuming operations, looking so close at the picture so many times, is that I noticed 2 more severe stitching errors: one in the middle, and one right of center. It means the withdrawal of the nominator is totally justified and very wise .
I don't think it's worth discussing more. We disagree, well, it happens. Let's the bot close this nomination. If more conversation needed on your side, please use the talk page of this candidature and ping me. Best regards, -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]