Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Female impala headshot.jpg

File:Female impala headshot.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2011 at 08:54:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Female impala headshot.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Female impala headshot.jpg

•  Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 08:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Muhammad (talk) 08:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC) By the way, how close were you at that moment?
•  Support -- 184.82.68.61 15:10, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
  • No anonymous votes are allowed, sorry. Please log in.--Jebulon (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful! (It's very centered though, it would be more balanced if you cropped a tiny bit on the left). -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Hi, Impala --Schnobby (talk) 16:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 16:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Przykuta → [edit] 16:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 03:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Centered isn't always a bad thing! --99of9 (talk) 06:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think you are a 100% right, it's not a rule. And I'm sayin this for many other images that got many negative votes for being centered, which, in my opinion, where not that bad. Besides, rules can be broken!
•  Support -- Raghith 07:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Can't resist supporting this wonderful portrait despite the too tight crop (let the poor thing b**!). Maybe it is still possible to add some space around the head. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Pure natural beauty. I know it is impossible, but it seems that one can see the photographer in the eye of the animal ! Otherwise agree with Alvesgaspar and 99of9. And please beware of over-categorization...--Jebulon (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - A.Savin 19:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very good, even if in this case I would have liked to see a bit more of the background with a higher DOF. --Gzzz (talk) 20:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX  ^talk  21:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent portrait. --ELEKHH^T 02:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Красавица.--Alexandronikos (talk) 07:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 08:57, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose good portrait, high EV, but for a FP the eyes should be in focus. DOF is also short and the crop at top is too tight IMO. A centered composition is ok for me here, though. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 22:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --MyCanon (talk) 05:43, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support. JukoFF (talk) 15:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:03, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling • talk 20:18, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support H. Krisp (talk) 11:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Trachemys (talk) 14:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals