Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Female argynnis paphia in Lill-Jansskogen.JPG

File:Female argynnis paphia in Lill-Jansskogen.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2009 at 16:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Female argynnis paphia in Lill-Jansskogen.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Female argynnis paphia in Lill-Jansskogen.JPG

•  Info Everything by Korall -- Korall (talk) 16:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Info I know the composition is not extraordinary but Im quite happy with the detail of the wings.
•  Support -- Korall (talk) 16:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Quite a narrow depth of field which caused the eyes and some parts of the wings to be out of focus. Well, sharp eyes may not be too important in this case. --Ernie (talk) 16:41, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment It is very hard to get every single part of a butterfly in focus. Please comepare with File:Kleiner Fuchs, Aglais urticae.JPG for example that was featured this year but in my opinion have worse focus problems with the wings. I sharpened the eyes and hope the reslult is ok. --Korall (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
  • I agree. If the Aglais urticae file is of FP quality then yours is too. --Ernie (talk) 21:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nice --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Sharpness/DOF is the only issue here for me. Shooting at f/8 may have been enough to overcome it. --Relic38 (talk) 11:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Maybe that or unsharp mask plus downsampling to a quarter of the size. I guess im just naive to think this image can be in the same leauge as the already featured pictures of argynnis butterflies like this or this or this or even this. --Korall (talk) 17:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

• You make a good case argument, however I probably would oppose most, if not, all of those. For me, your image is the best of the five, but I just can't decide one way or the other right now. --Relic38 (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

• • Do you think its a good iea to withdraw this one and start nominating butterfly pictures for delisting?--Korall (talk) 00:54, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Background a little too spotty.It could be cleaned and the noise (senn in 100% view). Darius Bauzys (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Petritap (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 01:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)