Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:El Cosmonauta Teaser Poster.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2010 at 23:45:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Angel Trancon - uploaded by ErCradel - nominated by Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 23:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 23:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)- InfoWhere is the permission by the copyright holder to use this image? Alanscottwalker (talk) 00:15, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Apart from on the poster itself? Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 00:23, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Are you saying the permission under a suitable commons licensee is visible on the poster, itself? If so, where? Alanscottwalker (talk) 00:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- On the left side, right after Angel Trancon. You have to zoom in to see them clearly, and they're iconic, not textual.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- I just reread the last thing I said here, and realized that it sounds...snippy. Sorry; no snippiness intended. We're all BFFs here. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 01:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Even so, the image guidelines state: "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image. Copyright/authorship information of all images should be located on the image's description page and should not interfere with content of the image." Alanscottwalker (talk) 02:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is a poster; those things are part of the content of the image.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note, for example, File:Joan of Arc WWI lithograph2.jpg. It lists both the artist (Haskell Coffin), and the place of printing (United States Printing and Lithograph Co.) on the poster. Posters, by nature, have to be self-contained, and thus tend to include their own copyright data/everything else. This one is part of an ambitious effort to make an entire movie and release it under a cc-by-sa license; I nominated it for dual reasons; I think the image is poignant and stirring, and I think there's nothing else like it on the Commons (a modern-day movie poster, that is.) Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is a poster; those things are part of the content of the image.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Even so, the image guidelines state: "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image. Copyright/authorship information of all images should be located on the image's description page and should not interfere with content of the image." Alanscottwalker (talk) 02:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- I just reread the last thing I said here, and realized that it sounds...snippy. Sorry; no snippiness intended. We're all BFFs here. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 01:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- On the left side, right after Angel Trancon. You have to zoom in to see them clearly, and they're iconic, not textual.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great! I love the image and I think a free licensed modern-day movie poster would be an awesome POTD! --Phyrexian (talk) 10:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Per Phyrexian --Kabelleger (talk) 20:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Opposeapart from thebad quality (maybe upscaling or bad scan)it hasn't a valid copyright status. The copyright holder is/are the photographer and/or the film company. You need a permission of them and show that with an ORTS tag in the file decription. Currently it's a copyright violation.--kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:12, 4 November 2010 (UTC)- Support As the poster itself shows, it has a creative commons license; no quality problems; featuring this may encourage the release of other posters. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
