Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) fawn morph Esk valley 2.jpg

File:Eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) fawn morph Esk valley 2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2024 at 17:52:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) fawn morph Esk valley 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eastern quoll (Dasyurus viverrinus) fawn morph Esk valley 2.jpg

1301

1662

807

247

4749

2526

blured — Preceding unsigned comment added by PetarM (talk • contribs)

186

1752

303

147

4697

3132

tail I don't see any second tail

1380

1869

352

186

4697

3132

unlucky blur retouched now

1801

1938

235

215

4697

3132

same problem retouched now

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Dasyuridae (Small marsupials, quolls)
•  Info Photo taken about 15 minutes after the current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Perhaps a tad underexposed. With harsh shadows, it looks like flash light did fire (though exif metadata says no) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support, but you didn't use a flash, right? --SHB2000 (talk) 05:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

• No flash; no artificial light; no reflector; late evening sunshine; focus stacked. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose Carls, you find my "blured" area maybe some 0,01 % area, but you cant find yours of some 5% (p.S. Anoted)? Colors go to silver, refractor used or lamp ? Comapred to FP you mention, colors and compo arent there, i wanted to say lean down, evade grass. But saw it is done on 1st - FP. Maybe a QI but not FP. --Mile (talk) 09:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

• Agree there's a technical issue -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

• Me too, thanks. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk)

• Well same problems, double tailed Eastern quoll, with doppler grass around, smaler area is blured but a bit to much, some notation added. Conclusion: sometime stack wont work, doing handfree might be problem. I made one with 16 shots. Too bad it didnt pass. I see you had 2 shots, was it autosetting ? Since it does not look like. --Mile (talk) 19:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC) p.S. In any case i would raise temp to get rid of silver colors.

•  Comment I defer to your expertise, but I still like it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

• Expertise? There is no double tail. I don't know what Mile means by autosetting. This camera has built in focus bracketing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

• Not that. You agreed that there was a technical issue and made an edit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Neutral A really good photo, but we already have a good FP of this same animal, so… ★ 00:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Neutral I know you didn't use flash but the harsh shadows make it look at first like an image taken with flash (though, when I look closely, I can tell it's not). Usual superb Charles image quality but I miss an outstanding composition, just the quoll frozen in place on a lawn. It wouldn't matter if this were the first FP but when you already have an FP of this species that has such an excellent composition, not sure what this one adds Cmao20 (talk) 01:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Strong shadow, unfavorable POV (too high) Poco a poco (talk) 08:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)