Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA, 1968-bluish tint fix attempt.jpg

File:Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA, 1968-bluish tint fix attempt.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2024 at 19:35:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA, 1968-bluish tint fix attempt.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA, 1968-bluish tint fix attempt.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1960-1969
•  Info created by Bernard Gotfryd, restored and uploaded by Yann and Brandmeister, nominated by Yann
•  Support -- Yann (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tell me which is more sharp and have film color tones... [1] which has 669 × 991 px or this. Could you please revert to 2nd option of GRuban, since you have now seperate nominee and that one best. In any case i cant support, adding px is unworthy here. -Mile (talk) 20:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

• @PetarM: "adding px"? You don't know what you are talking about. This version is made from the high resolution TIFF file. Of course, the downsampled version may be sharper. Yann (talk) 21:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support as the other version looks unnaturally bluish (not to mention original tiff). Brandmeister (talk) 21:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 20:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support This raw render work to me, look like typical 60s Kodak palette --Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support IMHO the colours are now authentic for film of that time. --Aristeas (talk) 13:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment I took the liberty to change the gallery link from People/Portrait to Historical/People#1960-1969; as the comment on People/Portrait says, “This gallery is for color head to half-lenght photographs […] of people from 1970 or later. For portrait photographs […] from 1969 or earlier, please use Historical portrait photos or Black and White portraits.” --Aristeas (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I dunno: A blueish tint in the shadows of a shot taken on daylight-balanced film is to be expected. Adjusting the facade in the background towards neutral grey is not the way to go here, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 09:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

  There wouldn't be such tint in modern photos under the same lighting conditions which to me suggests it's a thing of older technology that can be adjusted. Various digitized photos from that period have similar tint. Brandmeister (talk) 16:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

  • Yes, but IMHO in this version the shadows are still bluish enough; in the original the bluish tint was exaggerated – either a poor film was used, or it was not processed correctly in the lab. Of course everything depends on the film type used for the photograph, as different daylight films handled colours quite differently, even in the 1990s when I shot on film. It’s a pity that scans of old photographs almost never include information about the film. If they would just include the border of the transparency (often naming the film brand), we would know more. – Aristeas (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 13:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1960-1969