Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cyrtodactylus interdigitalis, Ulber’s bent-toed gecko - Phu Hin Rong Kla National Park (42662042381).jpg

File:Cyrtodactylus interdigitalis, Ulber’s bent-toed gecko - Phu Hin Rong Kla National Park (42662042381).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2020 at 15:32:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cyrtodactylus interdigitalis, Ulber’s bent-toed gecko - Phu Hin Rong Kla National Park (42662042381).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cyrtodactylus interdigitalis, Ulber’s bent-toed gecko - Phu Hin Rong Kla National Park (42662042381).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Gekkonidae (Geckos)
•  Info created by Rushenb - uploaded by B2Belgium - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose way off FP sharpness. Error in creator/upload info. Charles (talk) 16:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Error fixed. --Tomer T (talk) 17:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Sharpness seems OK to me. DoF could be better in some places but the head and most of the body of the lizard is sharp. Also this is very high-resolution so overall a clear FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• I've seen you make this comment before Cmao20. I don't think high resolution is (or should be) a big factor in voting for FP. I'd rather have a sharp 3000 x 2000 image than this effort which you can see is blurred at 640 x 427 pixels. Charles (talk) 08:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

• All I really mean is that it's unfair to judge pixel-level sharpness on a 40mpx image the same as you would for a 10mpx image, because it's like looking at the photo through a magnifying glass. I think that's what you mean too when you say you'd rather have a sharp smaller image than a larger unsharp one, so I don't think we actually disagree in general. As for this particular picture, the DoF is not perfect, but even at full size the lizard's head and a large amount of the body is pin-sharp, so I think it's good enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:20, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. DoF insufficient, background is sharper than central part of the animal. --Kreuzschnabel 14:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:35, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 09:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)