Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Couple with mobile phones at Senso-ji (cropped).jpg

File:Couple with mobile phones at Senso-ji (cropped).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2022 at 13:46:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Couple with mobile phones at Senso-ji (cropped).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Couple with mobile phones at Senso-ji (cropped).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
•  Info created by William Warby - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 13:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 13:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Too blurry, even for QI --H₂O^(talk) 14:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment How on earth is it possible to get such awful quality out of this excellent camera? --Kreuzschnabel 15:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Kreuzschnabel, ich empfinde diesen Kommentar als herabwürdigend und verletzend. Bitte lass uns hier einen sachlichen Umgangston ohne Sarkasmus pflegen. Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:55, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

1. Ich glaube nicht, dass der Autor hier mitliest, das Bild kommt von flickr. 2. Ich nutze die E-M1 II selbst und wüsste nicht, wie ich das hinbekommen sollte, wenn ein Kunde es wünscht, außer heftiger Nachbearbeitung. 3. Es war eine sachlich gemeinte Frage sowie ein kleiner Aufschrei des Entsetzens und in keiner Weise verletzend gemeint. 4. Da der Nominierer hier selbst ausgezeichnete Bilder beisteuert, kann ich mir diese Nominierung nur mit einem Irrtum erklären, und dann sollte man eine kleine Frotzelei schon vertragen. --Kreuzschnabel 17:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Das Gegenteil ist der Fall: niemand hier muss verletzende Kommentare vertragen, sondern wir alle haben die Verpflichtung, respektvoll miteinander umzugehen. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: very poor quality, nothing special at all

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreuzschnabel (talk • contribs)

• If we add a {{FPX}} to a nomination, let us please make sure to sign it. FPX is a strong verdict, it should never be added anonymously. I have supplemented the {{Unsigned}} template to attribute the FPX. --Aristeas (talk) 18:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Actually, I have been looking if there’s a field within the template for the signature but as I didn’t find one, I just set it without. Maybe that should be added. --Kreuzschnabel 20:34, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

It's not a problem. Just use 4 tildes as usual at the end. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination —Bruce1ee^talk 15:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)