Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coracias caudata-01.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

< Commons:Featured picture candidates

Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Coracias caudata-01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2012 at 16:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

Info created & uploaded by Hans Stieglitz - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Exzellent! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Prachtig! -- Famberhorst (talk) 19:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I find it a bit noisy, and it definitely can be corrected. Also, the image appears a bit dark; histogram has almost nothing on the right side, so the white clipping and/or exposure should be increased. --Ximeg (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition is not good. The branch on the foreground is disturbing. And also I would crop out the cut-off branch on the right site. --–Makele-90 (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautifull. that's one good looking bird --Uberprutser (talk) 21:27, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stas1995 (talk) 15:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Info edit by Uberprutser. Tomer T (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximeg (talk) 22:03, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Great detail.Fotoriety (talk) 23:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dey.sandip (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 09:35, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
weak support Very nice shot but quality at lower FP level (see noise in the tail), still good enough for FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 10:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Much better composition than the previous one. However, now there are several visible cloning marks. –Makele-90 (talk) 00:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stas1995 (talk) 15:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Makele-90 --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversharpened, tail OOF, unconvincing central composition. The pretty flashy colours of the roller are not only thing one should look at here! B.p. 17:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I left annotations. –Makele-90 (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both are nice, but I prefer the alternative. Michael Barera (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support— M♦Zaplotnik ^{my contributions} 14:08, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 19:00, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Béria Lima ^msg 16:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

The chosen alternative is: File:Coracias caudata-01-2.jpg

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Coracias_caudata-01.jpg&oldid=85838017"